Counting to 10 in Californian

I’m working on getting the California Codes online, focussing on the user’s experience: reading, searching, and accessing. This weekend I thought I had found an error in the numbering in the state’s online version, and so I headed to the law library to open a real book and see what’s going on. I was surprised to see that the printed text is the same. (West’s annotated and non-annotated editions.)

Here are three examples from the Code of Civil Procedure. The first, sections 676 et. seq. are the way I’d expect, in so-called natural sort order:

But here, a mathematical decimal ordering is in use:

Weirder still, both kinds are used in this group of codes:

3 thoughts on “Counting to 10 in Californian

  1. This is very strange. There are two people to contact:
    1) Editor at West for the Cal codes
    2) Carol Levitt, Internet for Lawyers. Carol I think used to teach Legal Research. I’m wondering if way back when that they did not leave open numbers for additions to the statutes with legislative changes. I’m dying to know the explanation to this! Sincerely, Cookie

  2. When the legislature overhauled the Code of Civil Procedure, they did a much better job. Now the numbers are decimal like 2019.010, 2019.210, etc.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s